首页> 外文OA文献 >Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Perangkat Bahan Bakar Pltn Tipe Pwr Ap 1000 dan Pwr 1000 Mwe Tipikal dengan Menggunakan Program Komputer
【2h】

Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Perangkat Bahan Bakar Pltn Tipe Pwr Ap 1000 dan Pwr 1000 Mwe Tipikal dengan Menggunakan Program Komputer

机译:使用计算机程序比较典型的燃料装置Pltn型Pwr Ap 1000和Pwr 1000 Mwe的性能

摘要

Investigation of fuel element thermal-hydraulic characteristic is important step related to aspect of fuel bundle reactor design. This paper analyzes of the PWR AP1000 and PWR 1000 MWe Typical of fuel bundle thermal-hydraulic using RELAP5 code. Choosing PWR AP 1000 and PWR 1000 MWe Typical because the both of them have almost same power that is 3400 MWth and 3410 MWth but have differences on fuel bundle sum, the high of active core, and rod diameter. On the fuel bundle, there are 17x17 fuel rods that have a radial factor the power varies. Modelling of fuel bundle are divided into 4 channel groups, ie. power factor of 1.396, range power factor of 1.203 to 1.394, power factor of le then 1.198 down and bypass channel. Axially, the channels are divided into 3 zones there are stand-off assembly at the bottom, an active length of the channel and the zone of upper plenum. The active length divided into 10 axial nodes. The goal of this analysis is fuel bundle design validation of PWR AP 1000 and PWR 1000 MWe Typical and get thermal-hydraulic comparison for steady-state condition. The analysis result including cooling floe rate, axial temperature distribution of cladding and cooling temperature, heat flux and pressure drop. In steady condition, the model was verified with the parameter of AP-1000 and PWR 1000 thermal-hydraulic design in which shows a good agreement. Verification results show that the model is made still need refinement, however qualitatively within realistic limits. Further updating of the model will be done to get a better verification results.
机译:燃料元件热工水力特性的研究是与燃料束反应堆设计有关的重要步骤。本文使用RELAP5代码对PWR AP1000和PWR 1000 MWe典型燃料束热工液压油进行分析。选择PWR AP 1000和PWR 1000 MWe通常是因为两者的功率几乎相同,分别为3400 MWth和3410 MWth,但在燃料束总和,活动堆芯高和杆直径方面存在差异。在燃料束上,有17x17个燃料棒,它们的径向功率会发生变化。燃料束的建模分为4个通道组,即。功率因数为1.396,范围功率因数为1.203至1.394,功率因数然后为1.198,向下并旁路通道。从轴向上看,通道分为3个区域,底部有支架组件,通道的有效长度和上充气区。有效长度分为10个轴向节点。该分析的目的是验证PWR AP 1000和PWR 1000 MWe典型燃料束的设计,并获得稳态条件下的热工液压比较。分析结果包括冷却絮凝率,包层轴向温度分布和冷却温度,热通量和压降。在稳态条件下,用AP-1000和PWR 1000热工设计参数对模型进行了验证,吻合良好。验证结果表明,仍需对模型进行完善,但在质量上要在现实的范围内。将对模型进行进一步的更新以获得更好的验证结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号